An article by Tony Strong about Wicca, published in The
Independent:
Witches go on-line, off-broomstick
In 1937 a retired civil servant called Gerald Gardner, having recently
moved to the New Forest, met a wealthy spinster with the rather
wonderful name of Dorothy Clutterbuck. After they had got to know
each other, she confessed a secret: she belonged to a nearby coven
of witches, which had existed in hiding for nearly 2,000 years.
Their rituals were concerned not with the traditional broomsticks
and potions, but with the worship of an ancient nature-goddess called
Aradia.
Gerald Gardner was soon initiated into this coven himself, earning
the right to call himself a Wiccan - old English for witch - and
to copy Dorothy's precious Book of Shadows, the coven's
liturgy. Membership was dwindling, however, and Gerald was eventually
allowed to break his vows of secrecy and publish a fictional account
of their Craft, High Magic's Aid, followed by the autobiographical
Witchcraft Today.
The effect was remarkable. Post-war Britain was hurtling into
the television age: Gardner was an adroit manipulator of his own
image. Well-publicised spats with the notorious Aleister Crowley,
at one time also a member of the coven, and various other disciples
over obscure points of liturgy, and revelations about nudity - "working
skyclad" - fuelled media interest. Wicca's emphasis on liberating
the individual consciousness left it perfectly positioned for the
Sixties; its use of sex rituals kept it booming through the Seventies,
and its eco-orientated philosophy made it perfect for the Eighties
and Nineties. There are now an estimated three-quarter of a million
Wiccans, while a search for Wiccan sites on the internet will give
you over 57,000 to choose from. It is claimed to be the fastest-growing
religion in the West.
But just how authentic is Wicca? Well, there are strong arguments
for the survival of paganism. After all, the early Christians never
bothered to physical relics of the old religions, like Stonehenge,
so it's reasonable top suppose they were equally relaxed about its
practitioners. It was not until the 11th century that Canute thought
to actually make it illegal to "worship heathen gods, and the
sun and the moon, or forest trees of any sort, or witchcraft."
And an amateur anthropologist called Charles Leland found pagan
practitioners in rural Italy as late as the 18th century.
Gardner's Book of Shadows, finally published only a few
years ago, seems to bear out this historical continuity. It has
snatches of a secret language - the so-called Bagahai Rune - whilst
the injunction to be "naked in your rites" parallels a
Tuscan spell recorded by Leland. There are similarities with elements
of the cabbala and the corpus hermeticum, and the preface
explains the need for secrecy by warning that witches who were caught
risked "going to the pyre".
Unfortunately, it also contains bits of Kipling. The Bagahai Rune
is probably an old Basque folksong, and other parts are cribbed
from Yeats's Order of the Golden Dawn. Moreover, a witch in Hampshire
wouldn't have risked the pyre: in England, witches were hanged,
not burned.
Yet, just as Christianity survived the Victorian realisation that
the Bible isn't all gospel, so the accusation that Wicca is a made-up
religion seems not to have dented its popularity, but rather to
have liberated it from the dogmatists and allowed it to evolve into
many different forms or "traditions": Saxon Wicca, Feminist
Wicca, even Native American and Aboriginal Wicca.
When I began researching a novel about witchcraft, set mainly
around the Scottish witch trials of the 17th century, my heroine,
a feminist academic, is looking for proof that a so-called witch's
real crime was not devil-worship but lesbianism. I found that a
tiny sub-plot about modern-day Wiccans gradually took on a life
of its own, and a new theme emerged: humanity's extraordinary need
to reinvent its past. For every writer, Wicca's success is a reminder
that what is written as fiction doesn't necessarily stay that way.
|