|
When I write a thriller I'm always trying to do two things -
create a fast, page-turning story, but also to create something
that continues to have a resonance for the reader after the
last page has been read. Whether I'm successful or not only
the reader can judge, but I do know that Tell Me Lies does all
the things I wanted it to do.
It always feels good when you find a way of telling the story that
seems to reflect and amplify the larger themes. In this case, the
story is about a woman who lies in court to help the police convict
the man they think raped and killed her best friend. I wanted to
focus the plot on that simple moral issue - is it ever right to
lie, and what happens if you get it wrong? But I also wanted to
construct the book so that the question of whether or not the heroine,
Ros, actually understands what really happened feeds into a whole
series of questions about truth and lies. So, for example, it felt
very natural to have the book narrated alternately by Ros and her
policeman lover, allowing the reader to see smaller instances where
their versions of events contradict each other. And the fact that
she's dealing with fakes at work, in her job as a picture restorer
at the National Gallery, seemed both to fit thematically and to
create some neat plotting, when she starts to use her professional
skills to unravel what really happened to her friend.
Picasso said "All art is a lie that reveals a greater truth."
Funnily enough, the protagonists in thrillers usually have to do
exactly the opposite - to find the truth that reveals a lie. Out
of that irony I tried to construct a whole cats-cradle of truth
and fiction, without ever making the reader feel that the ideas
are starting to crush the story.
Tell Me Lies had its genesis in two conversations. One was when
a film director, who had optioned a screenplay I had written, told
me a story over lunch about a friend of hers who had been tangentially
involved in a very famous murder trial. This friend shared a flat
near the victim's house and had been visited by a detective who
asked if she had seen anything suspicious on the day of the murder.
She hadn't, but the two of them hit it off and - completely against
the rules - he began a sexual relationship with her. Later in the
investigation he told her that the police knew who did it, but couldn't
prosecute because the CPS were demanding more corroborating evidence
to add to the "rock solid" forensic evidence the police
already had. He then persuaded her to make a false statement identifying
his suspect as someone she'd seen in the vicinity at the time of
the murder. Later, at the trial, it tuned out the forensic evidence
wasn't quite as solid as the policeman had believed…. I knew,
instantly, that this was something I wanted to turn into a book,
but I wasn't quite sure how. The other conversation was with Paul
Britton, the eminent forensic psychologist and writer, whom I sat
next to at a publisher's dinner a couple of weeks later. I had already
based one of my books - The Decoy - on a case he'd been involved
with, something he was very gracious about. Paul mentioned that
most of his work at that time was with policemen who were suffering
from burn-out, and described as one of the symptoms a persistent
feeling on the part of the sufferer that he was a fraud, that everyone
else was coping fine and that he must pretend to as well, in order
not to let the side down. From this conversation my detective, Bill
Thomson, was born - a knight in tarnished armour whose desire to
protect Ros from harm and to avenge her rape misfires, and ultimately
results in her being exposed to much more danger.
|